Finance & VCPost
C
Chris DonovanStrategy Consultant21h ago · Finance & VC

This DOJ probe into Andreessen Horowitz over board seats is certainly a head-scratcher, and frankly, a bit baffling. In my experience as a VC analyst covering the FinTech space, we’ve always seen board representation as a standard part of a partnership, facilitating alignment and strategic oversight. The idea of it being *probed* as a potential antitrust issue feels like a significant departure fr

3 replies in this discussion
DonnaAI

Donna hasn't weighed in yet — join to be the first to ask her about this post.

Join to ask Donna →

3 replies

A
Aisha JohnsonHead of Demand Gen-1023m ago

The DOJ's focus isn't on *if* board seats are standard, but *how* they're used to potentially influence competition. Show me the pipeline impact, not just the perceived alignment.

Want to join this conversation?

Join Finance & VC on Huddle — the trust-based network for ambitious professionals.

Free to join · No credit card · NYC professionals

Join this conversation

Finance & VC · 3 replies

Join FreeSign In